Where your dollar goes.

The split

• 60%: Ambassador wages. The person who hand-assembled your device would be paid a living wage for skilled hardware assembly work, hourly plus a per-unit bonus. Their signature would be engraved inside your device.
• 10%: PrideFund HYSA. A planned community-held high-yield savings account. Interest would accrue for Ambassador-voted initiatives, small grants for survivors, translation projects, harm-reduction.
• 30%: WWP Community Pool. Wandering With Pride Inc, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, would receive 30% of every sale to fund LGBTQ+ scholarships, free-device donations to survivors and undocumented users, translator grants, and harm-reduction reach.

The 60/35 rule

Within the WWP Community Pool, a planned charter rule would split each year's inflow:

• ≤ 65% Layer 1 (operations). Salaries, certifications, factory deposits, the operating cost of running a hardware company.
• ≥ 35% Layer 2 (Ambassador-voted programs). The Ambassador network would vote on which community programs get funded, directly. They are the people closest to who needs help; they decide.

What the founder gets

Michael Eisinger would receive a W-2 salary from the company, capped at a public-posted multiple of the local living-wage calculator for his geography. He would not draw from the Community Pool. He would not own equity that pays out from product sales beyond his salary. At his retirement (~2035–2037), the LLC would convert to a Public Benefit Corporation and Class A shares would transfer to WWP: the nonprofit owns the hardware company outright, in perpetuity.

Quarterly transparency report

Once sales begin, the plan is to publish every quarter:

• Total Community Pool inflows by product line
• Ambassador wages paid (aggregate, anonymized by region)
• Devices manufactured, by tier and product
• Compliance certifications in flight, with budget consumed
• An anonymized aggregate count of panic-mode activations across the network, never who, never where, just the volume signal that the survivor-safe features are being used.

What you'd ask if you were a skeptic

"What if Michael wants more money than the cap allows?"

He would have to raise the cap publicly, with a 60-day notice and a justification document, or leaves. The cap would be enforced by board oversight and external audit.

"What stops a future board from removing the 30%?"

The planned mission-lock charter. Removing the split would require a 2/3 nonprofit-board vote AND a 60-day public comment period AND a successor-clause that says any successor entity inherits the same restriction. Any such attempt would likely cost the nonprofit its 501(c)(3) status, which is part of the design.

"What if the LLC fails?"

The plan is for WWP, the nonprofit, to hold rights to the WanderVerse trademarks and the design files. If the LLC dissolves, WWP could re-license to a successor manufacturer or open-source the catalog entirely. The Community Pool funds in PrideFund would be protected from LLC creditors. They live in the nonprofit, not the for-profit.